Elementary CCs for evaluating internet sites

Adapted from: Ten Cs for evaluating internet resources. University of Wisconsin-eau Clare. updated 9 March 2003
 
1 Credibility
Who is the author? Is there information about the author? Can you find it? 
 
2 Credentials
Who is the author? What qualifications, education, training, experience, knowledge do they have? Do they  work for a responsible and known organisation?
 
3 Clues
Do you know how to check the publisher, ie using domain types, header or footer, watermark or wallpaper, link to home page etc? What do suffixes like .gov  .org  tell you about the source?
 
4 Contact and communication
Can the author or web coordinator be contacted for comment or questioning?
 
5 Commendation
Has the site been recommended or reviewed by someone reliable?
 
6 Content
What is the purpose of the information? eg Is it serious or humorous, professional or amateur? 
Is it valid information, or a thinly disguised commercial? 
Is it genuine and trustworthy, or is it a 'virtual soapbox', mostly opinion, or biased?
Is it fair, offering a balanced argument, not slanted or selective?
Does it encourage thoughtful assessment, or are there sweeping statements or excessive claims?
 
7 Coverage
What is the scope? Is the topic covered in depth? Is it full and comprehensive, or is it trivial?
 
8 Comprehension
What is the level? eg Is it too academic, too complicated, too long? 
 
9 Critical thinking
Do you accept everything, or do you think about how useful it is first? Can you treat this the same way you would treat a published book? Does it answer the question, or have you drifted? 
 
10 Citation
Do you respect the fact that this is someone's work? Is it stated that it is 'Public domain', or is it protected by copyright? Do you give credit to the author? Do you keep a record of the source? 
 
11 Currency
Has the information been updated? Has it been pruned and 'dusted' so that it is fresh? 
 
12 Continuity
Will it continue to be updated? Or might it be 'orphaned'? Can you rely on it over time? 
 
13 Connectivity 
Does access require special software? If it is popular, and therefore busy, will it be accessible in the time you have? Is the site 'viewable' by all web browsers? Do the links still work? 
 
14 Clarity
Is the design appealing, with elegant simplicity, or is it fussy, crowded, complicated? Do too many fancy or large graphics make it slow to load? Do special features enhance or hinder?
 
15 Context
Search engines can retrieve pages out of context. Can you return to the home page to determine the source? Has the author shown where the information came from? Are more links provided?
 
16 Cruise control
Does every page have an index, navigation buttons or links to get around? Is there a site map, table of contents, or outline of topics? If there is a lot of information, is there a search function? 
 
17 Completeness
Is there a comparable source? Is the internet version complete, or partial? eg some newspapers. 
 
18 Correctness
Are the facts correct? Websites can contain unchecked information. How will you know?
 
19 Cultural bias
Are people treated with fairness and tolerance? Or can you see bias, stereotyping, insults, loaded language, racism, other 'isms, hurtful ideas? See Checklist for cultural bias
 
19 Quality control 
Has it been proofread, checked and edited? Is the spelling okay? Is it reliable? 
 
21 Care and caution
Do you remember to keep an eye open in case something isn't appropriate for you? 
 
22 Comparability
How does internet information fit into your subject and search? Are you looking for particular kinds of information eg current, historical, definitions, statistics, narrative, research results or opinions? Would it be easier to use another source for a particular question, or does the internet fill a gap?

What students have to say: 

Counter.  How popular and well-used is it?  Hayasa
Country. Do you check the suffix to see where it comes from? eg au, ca  Georgia
Connections. What other links does the site recommend? Daniel
Copyright. Has it been copied from other sites? If so, do they give credit? Alex
Confusion Will you click the wrong button? Will it lead you somewhere unwanted? Check before you click. Iona
Chop and crop. You can cut the extensions off the address to find the home page. Ms Macmillan
Is it too complicated? Is the information at our level, or is it too hard? Maxine
Control curiosity.  Do you go into sites that have nothing to do with your topic? Stay on track. Vivienne
Concept map. Do you have it beside you, to check and add to? anonymous teacher (AE)
Certainty. Do the makers of the website know it is true? Tom
How does it compare to other information on the web or in books. Harry
Is it cool, not crazy? Kenneth
Is it too childish? Do we get distracted playing games, or are they helping us learn? Karey
Is it creative? Samantha
Is it compassionate, kind, not cruel? Gurjit
Is it consistent? Do the facts agree with each other, and with facts from other books? Li
 

References: 

adapted with permission from: RICHMOND, Betsy. Ten C's for evaluating internet resources. Mcintyre Library, University of Wisconsin-eau Clare. [Please acknowledge both sources.]

also using A.L.A. Selection criteria: How to tell if you are looking at a great website

CASE & DANIELS Critical challenges about electronic information and research. Vancouver, 1999

CASE, Roland Promoting critical thinking about information technologies. BC Teacher-Librarian Conference 1999
 

Similar sites: 

Health Education Agency The quality information checklist
see also our Checklist for cultural bias



Adapted by Maggie Roche (teacher-librarian), with permission from Betsy Richmond

May Gibbs Memorial Library   | Neutral Bay Public School